Hashtable vs. HashMap in Java

Two commonly used data structures for key-value pair storage are Hashtable and HashMap. In this blog, we’ll delve deep into Hashtable and HashMap, providing in-depth explanations, examples, and insights into their performance and memory differences. By the end of this blog, you’ll have a clear understanding of when to use each of these data structures.


Hashtable is one of the oldest data structures in Java and is part of the java.util package. It is a synchronized data structure, which means it is thread-safe, making it suitable for multi-threaded applications.


Hashtable<KeyType, ValueType> hashtable = new Hashtable<>();


Hashtable<Integer, String> hashtable = new Hashtable<>();
hashtable.put(1, "One");
hashtable.put(2, "Two");
hashtable.put(3, "Three");


HashMap, on the other hand, is also part of the java.util package but is not synchronized. This means that it is not inherently thread-safe, but it provides better performance in single-threaded applications. It is widely used due to its speed and versatility.


HashMap<KeyType, ValueType> hashMap = new HashMap<>();


HashMap<Integer, String> hashMap = new HashMap<>();
hashMap.put(1, "One");
hashMap.put(2, "Two");
hashMap.put(3, "Three");

Performance Comparison

1. Synchronization:

Hashtable is synchronized, making it suitable for multi-threaded applications where multiple threads might access and modify the data concurrently. However, this synchronization comes at a cost. In single-threaded applications, this overhead can make Hashtable slower than HashMap.

HashMap is not synchronized by default, which means it’s faster in single-threaded applications. If synchronization is required, you can use Collections.synchronizedMap(hashMap) to wrap it and make it thread-safe.

2. Performance:

HashMap tends to outperform Hashtable in most cases due to its lack of synchronization. This makes it a preferred choice for applications where thread safety is not a primary concern. However, when dealing with multi-threaded applications, Hashtable might be a better choice due to its thread-safe nature.

Memory Comparison

Hashtable and HashMap have similar memory footprints, as both store key-value pairs. The memory used by these data structures is primarily determined by the number of key-value pairs stored, the capacity of the underlying arrays, and the load factor.

When to Use Hashtable

  1. In multi-threaded applications: When you need thread safety and multiple threads are accessing and modifying the data concurrently, Hashtable is a suitable choice.
  2. Legacy code: In older Java applications, you may encounter Hashtable, and it might be necessary to maintain compatibility.

When to Use HashMap

  1. In single-threaded applications: HashMap is a better choice due to its performance benefits. If you need thread safety in a single-threaded application, you can use Collections.synchronizedMap(hashMap) to make it thread-safe.
  2. When performance is critical: In scenarios where you need maximum performance, especially in high-throughput systems, HashMap is often the preferred choice.
  3. Newer Java applications: HashMap is more commonly used in modern Java programming.

Both Hashtable and HashMap serve the purpose of storing key-value pairs, but they have different characteristics that make them suitable for specific use cases. Hashtable is thread-safe but slower in single-threaded applications, while HashMap is faster but requires additional synchronization for thread safety. Consider the nature of your application and the specific requirements to make an informed choice between these two data structures. In modern Java development, HashMap is often the preferred choice, but Hashtable still has its place in legacy and multi-threaded applications.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top